Monday, June 26, 2006

2837.aspx

Pigs will fly

...or at least glow in the dark. BBC has more on the three pigs that "glow in the dark".




The pigs are transgenic, created by adding genetic material from jellyfish into a normal pig embryo.
...
In daylight, the researchers say the pigs' eyes, teeth and trotters look green. Their skin has a greenish tinge.


In the dark, shine a blue light on them and they glow torch-light bright.


Via Random Good Stuff

Friday, June 23, 2006

2831.aspx

The $100 burger...

The $100 burger doesn't look like much but contains meat from three continents; American prime beef, and meat from Japanese Kobe and Argentine cattle.



Where? The Boca Raton Resort and Club, where a membership costs $40,000 and an additional $3,600 a year.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

2830.aspx

The Onion explains Americas behavior

Another "scoop" by the Onion: U.S. May Have Been Abused During Formative Years



WASHINGTON, DC—A team of leading historians and psychiatrists issued a report Wednesday claiming that the United States was likely the victim of abuse by its founding fathers and motherland when it was a young colony.


The War of 1812, an example of early abuse by the motherland.
 "In its adulthood, the U.S. displays all the classic tendencies of a nation that was repeatedly mistreated in its infancy—difficulty forming lasting foreign relationships, viewing everyone as a potential enemy, and employing a pattern of assault and intimidation to assert its power," said Dr. Howard Drexel, the report's lead author. "Because of trust issues stemming from the abuse, America has become withdrawn, has not made an ally in years, and often resents the few nations that are willing to lend support—most countries outgrow this kind of behavior after 230 years."


"America compensated for early mistreatment by taking out this pent-up aggression on other nations—getting involved in aggressive conflicts seemingly just for the thrill of it, starting arguments and wars that can't be won, suspecting that everyone is out to get them," Drexel said. "This nation needs help, but by its very nature, refuses to accept it."


:-)

Thursday, June 8, 2006

2809.aspx

Girlfriend 6.0 vs. Wife 1.0

Comparative trial of Girlfriend 6.0 vs. Wife 1.0 



Last year a friend of mine upgraded from GirlFriend 6.0 to Wife 1.0 and found that it's a memory hog leaving very little system resources available for other applications. He is now noticing that Wife 1.0 is also spawning Child Processes which are further consuming valuable resources. No mention of this particular phenomena was included in the product brochure or the documentation, though other users have informed him that this is to be expected due to the nature of the application.


...


I myself decided to avoid the headaches associated with Wife 1.0 by sticking with Girlfriend 7.0. Even here, however, I found many problems. Apparently you cannot install Girlfriend 7.0 on top of Girlfriend 6.0. You must uninstall Girlfriend 6.0 first. Other users say this is a long standing bug that I should have known about. Apparently the versions of Girlfriend have conficts over shared use of the I/O port. You think they would have fixed such a stupid bug by now. To make matters worse, The uninstall program for Girlfriend 6.0 doesn't work very well leaving undesirable traces of the application in the system. Another thing -- all versions of Girlfriend continually popup little annoying messages about the advantages of upgrading to Wife 1.0.


...


Wife 1.0 has an undocumented bug. If you try to install Mistress 1.1 before uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.1 will refuse to install, claiming insufficient resources.


...


Wife 1.0 is a great program, but very high-maintenance. Consider buying additional software to improve the performance of Wife 1.0. I recommend Flowers 3.1 and Diamonds 2K. Do not, under any circumstances, install Secretary with Short Skirt 3.3. This is not a supported application for Wife 1.0 and is likely to cause irreversible damage to the operating system.

Wednesday, June 7, 2006

2796.aspx

F1!

2795.aspx

The Football World Cup is bad for internet traffic as well

The Football World cup is not only bad for traffic, it will bring the British internet to a halt as well:



The British broadcaster plans to offer broadband-connected office workers the chance to watch World Cup games at their desks. The move risks bringing corporate networks to a halt, warns network management firm Packeteer, in what we suspect will be the first in a string of announcements for networking vendors on the subject.